Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<January 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

More Links










 Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Wire photos confuse the heck out of me!
Posted by Chris

wire photo 2300.jpgAll right. I am totally confused about the wonderful world of wire photos. I have seen them sell for thousands and have seen very nice ones sell for well under 20 bucks. What is the reason for this huge gap in price?

I understand that for any piece of memorabilia a few factors have to be taken into consideration:
- How rare is it?
- Is it original?
- How significant is it?
-How eye appealing is it?
-What condition is it in?

I honestly think you can throw at least one of these factors out the window when considering wire photos. I have seen many examples sell for big money even if they aren’t in great condition. Personally, I love the ones that have the AP stamp and date on the back. Crop marks are also a plus in my eyes.

wire photo 330 ebay.jpgThe most important factor when determining the desirability of a wire photo seems to be if it is a first-generation photo. I am definitely not a wire photo expert, but I truly believe that most of them are first generation photos. If a Hank Aaron 715 HR photo has a 1988 stamp on the back of it, then I am sure that it is probably not a first-generation example, but as long as the stamps are from the general timeframe of the event, I would assume that it is an original first-generation wire photo.

The next factors when determining value are all very close as far as importance goes, in my opinion.
How rare, significant and eye appealing a photo is seems to be what buyers consider.

Here are my questions and why I am so confused.
wire photo 220.jpgThe Joe Jackson photo on the right sold for $2,300, the Ruth sold for $1,100, the Aaron sold for $330 and the Rose sold for $220.

Now comes the confusing part and keep in mind, I believe all of these to be first-generation, original wire photos.
The Bill Russell/Red Aurebach photo only sold for $15, the Aaron photo picturing his very significant home run No. 600 went for a mere 20 bucks!

Yes, I understand that the Ruth and Jackson photos are very rare and very cool, but the Rose is from 1970 and doesn’t seem to be that much more significant that Aaron’s 600th HR. Not $200 more significant, I am sure of that.

wire5 15.jpgThese are just a few examples of what I am talking about. Punch in “wire photo” on eBay right now and see for yourself.

wirephoto7.jpgFeel free to share with me what you have found.




5/8/2007 4:47:15 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [1]
5/21/2007 7:25:18 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)

I think you answered your own question in the first paragraph about why there is a large value gap in the price of wire photos.

It is a confusing market. Prices are all over the board. There does not appear to be a set price guide for these wire photos. There are no "sets to complete" or checklists. How many were produced? How many survived? What exactly does dictate value? How do I educate myself about them? Will current production become obselete as media delivery to the public morphs? There are a finite number of these things from past years but reproductions also cloud the water.

I could track say autograph prices and card values for the last 20 years by analyzing written price guides. I can study those markets and their trends over a period of time. When I study the wire photo market, I see alot of inconsistency like you have also pointed out(actually, this data is even tough to locate). It is very difficult to get a feel for the price market for wire photos during the last 20 years. Collecting wire photos and original sports photography seems to be a market that is just currently emerging to a wider audience. The market is now picking up despite the fact that much of this photography has been around for decades and decades.

This shift in the market is in part due to the expense of current cards and autographs. There is a invisible financial thresh hold that collectors unknowlingly bump up against and then their eyes start to wander towards another segment in the hobby to graduate on towards. There has been a growth of the single player or single team collector. Wire photos are a perfectly seductive alternative for all types of collectors. They display great, are flat and can be stored easy, can be found very cheap at times,some have descriptive captions, many are very old but in nice condition, they can be a true "one of one", are great conversation pieces, and they are not over produced. Add to this that any collector can find a wire photo that fits into their collection: all teams, all cities, all sports, and all moments are arguably available including many casual shots . Many of the photos have a cross collectible aspect(fashion, other celebrities, economics, sociology, history, and on and on).

Wire photos are generally produced during a players career and were not necessarily meant to be saved, two of my favorite measuring sticks for uber cool collectibles.

Once the demand increases, photos will start to be slabbed, authenticated and graded. Let us just hope we do not see cut up "wire photo swatches" pasted with a glue stick into insert cards. Ironically, several old wire photos have been chopped up for a cut autograph.

That Joe Jackson went for $2300? I wonder how many similar authentic photos can be found at garage sales for a dime. They are out there. Maybe it is time to start keeping an eye out for them.......................... there are truck loads of them that have yet to be discovered.
Dave
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):